SI
Bank Universe

Data source: CET1 ratio sourced from FDIC Call Reports (bank-subsidiary level). Published figures from investor relations may differ by 1–2pp as those reflect the bank holding company level. For precise regulatory CET1 figures, refer to each bank's quarterly earnings release.

TD Bank

TD
US · USRegulated by OCCLatest: 2026-Q2
72HIGH

CET1 Ratio

16.16%-2.12pp QoQ

Common Equity Tier 1 / RWA

Risk-Weighted Assets

$211.6B

+0.65% QoQ growth

Total Loan Book

$162.6B

-3.7% YoY growth

Leverage Ratio

10.32%

Tier 1 / Average assets

CET1 Ratio Trend

8 quarters · regulatory minimum 8% · scoring threshold 12%

RWA Growth

Bars = total ($B) · Line = QoQ growth %

Loan Book Composition

Latest quarter · 2026-Q2

Comm. Real Estate15.0%
Consumer22.3%
SME / C&I14.4%
Other48.3%

Metric History

50 quarters · FDIC Call Reports

QuarterCET1 %Leverage %RWALoan BookLoans YoYRWA QoQCRE %Consumer %SME %SRT Score
2026-Q2latest16.16%10.32%$211.6B$162.6B-3.7%+0.65%15.0%22.3%14.4%72
2026-Q118.28%11.50%$210.3B$163.1B-3.9%+0.69%14.9%22.2%14.2%70
2025-Q418.11%11.33%$208.8B$163.7B-8.8%-0.68%14.9%22.4%13.8%12
2025-Q317.97%11.13%$210.2B$164.9B-9.6%-0.76%15.1%22.1%13.8%13
2025-Q217.85%10.84%$211.8B$168.8B-7.4%-1.63%14.8%21.2%15.7%13
2025-Q117.49%10.50%$215.4B$169.8B-6.8%-2.34%14.8%20.8%16.4%12
2024-Q416.94%9.94%$220.5B$179.4B-0.4%-1.13%13.9%20.1%16.2%26
2024-Q316.95%10.23%$223.0B$182.4B+2.8%-0.04%13.6%19.7%17.2%18
2024-Q217.70%10.93%$223.1B$182.4B+5.0%+0.25%13.6%19.5%17.4%15
2024-Q117.53%10.91%$222.6B$182.1B—+1.19%13.4%19.4%17.6%31
2023-Q417.78%11.01%$220.0B$180.2B—+1.03%13.4%19.0%17.8%19
2023-Q318.04%10.93%$217.7B$177.5B—+1.12%13.4%19.1%18.0%10
2023-Q217.89%10.52%$215.3B$173.8B——13.6%18.6%18.0%15
2023-Q117.59%9.95%$216.3B$169.3B——13.9%18.4%18.5%—
2022-Q417.75%10.13%$212.5B$165.3B+8.9%+2.02%14.0%18.7%20.1%—
2022-Q317.73%9.56%$208.3B$160.8B+5.3%+2.76%14.1%19.2%19.2%—
2022-Q217.41%8.92%$202.7B$157.4B+0.5%+4.10%14.4%19.2%19.3%—
2022-Q117.87%8.58%$194.7B$153.3B-3.7%+3.23%14.8%19.4%20.2%—
2021-Q418.12%8.48%$188.6B$151.7B-5.3%+1.25%14.5%19.3%20.4%—
2021-Q318.02%8.50%$186.3B$152.7B-6.2%+0.63%15.0%19.2%20.6%—
2021-Q217.74%8.22%$185.1B$156.6B-4.6%-0.03%14.7%19.0%22.3%—
2021-Q117.42%8.22%$185.2B$159.2B-0.1%-0.44%14.9%18.6%23.9%—
2020-Q415.35%7.49%$186.0B$160.2B+5.7%-0.42%14.8%18.6%23.1%—
2020-Q314.98%7.55%$186.8B$162.8B+7.9%-1.30%14.4%18.3%24.2%—
2020-Q214.60%7.66%$189.2B$164.2B+10.5%+0.61%14.2%17.9%25.7%—
2020-Q114.53%8.69%$188.1B$159.4B+6.9%+3.08%14.3%18.6%24.4%—
2019-Q414.76%8.95%$182.5B$151.5B+3.0%+1.85%14.5%19.8%21.5%—
2019-Q314.77%9.05%$179.1B$151.0B+6.2%+1.25%14.2%19.6%22.4%—
2019-Q215.34%9.48%$176.9B$148.7B+5.7%+2.01%14.5%19.0%22.6%—
2019-Q115.31%9.32%$173.4B$149.1B+6.6%+0.81%14.2%18.3%22.9%—
2018-Q415.04%9.17%$172.0B$147.2B+3.7%+0.39%14.1%18.5%22.2%—
2018-Q314.88%9.14%$171.4B$142.2B+0.6%+1.10%14.4%19.2%21.1%—
2018-Q214.74%8.99%$169.5B$140.6B+3.6%+1.60%14.6%19.1%21.8%—
2018-Q114.91%9.02%$166.8B$139.8B+3.9%+0.58%14.7%19.1%22.2%—
2017-Q414.79%9.02%$165.9B$141.9B+5.3%+0.29%14.6%19.1%22.3%—
2017-Q314.78%9.53%$165.4B$141.3B+6.5%+4.60%14.4%18.7%21.6%—
2017-Q214.39%8.93%$158.1B$135.7B+4.0%+1.54%14.9%18.7%22.9%—
2017-Q114.21%8.70%$155.7B$134.5B+6.3%-1.25%14.9%18.3%23.0%—
2016-Q413.67%8.57%$157.7B$134.7B+7.6%+0.77%14.5%18.4%22.9%—
2016-Q313.49%8.61%$156.5B$132.7B+10.7%+1.72%14.5%18.4%23.0%—
2016-Q213.39%8.65%$153.9B$130.5B+11.7%+2.58%14.5%18.3%22.8%—
2016-Q113.39%8.54%$150.0B$126.5B+11.3%+1.43%14.5%18.1%22.7%—
2015-Q413.41%8.68%$147.9B$125.2B+13.0%+3.50%13.9%18.0%21.7%—
2015-Q313.61%8.66%$142.9B$119.9B+11.2%+2.55%14.2%18.0%21.3%—
2015-Q213.65%8.65%$139.3B$116.8B+11.4%+1.44%14.1%17.6%20.8%—
2015-Q113.57%8.56%$137.3B$113.6B+11.7%+4.15%14.4%17.3%20.6%—
2014-Q412.74%8.00%$131.9B$110.9B+9.4%+1.58%14.5%17.3%19.6%—
2014-Q312.67%8.01%$129.8B$107.8B+8.3%+2.21%14.8%17.5%19.0%—
2014-Q212.12%7.59%$127.0B$104.9B+7.7%+2.65%15.1%17.2%18.8%—
2014-Q111.98%7.34%$123.7B$101.7B+7.1%+0.70%15.8%17.2%18.5%—

AI Investment Memo

Llama will analyze TD Bank across 4 data dimensions and write a structured memo

Score: 72/100·Model: gpt-oss-120b·Tools: get_bank_metrics · get_historical_deals · get_regulatory_context · calculate_candidate_score

Click Generate Analysis to create an investment memo

Llama will call 4 tools then write a structured memo covering thesis, deal sizing, timing, and risks

Score Breakdown

72/100 —HIGH

Repeat issuer · scored on re-issuance timing

Re-issuance timing72
Last deal
5 mo ago
Typical cadence
12 mo
Through its re-issue cycle42%

Active SRT programme → scored on how overdue it is vs its own cadence. Validated to predict re-issuance better than fundamentals, which are shown below for context only.

Fundamentals — context only

Capital Pressure5/40
CET1 16.16% — well above management threshold
+0
-4.16pp headroom above 8% regulatory floor
+0
CET1 declined 1 quarter (18.28% → 16.16%)
+5
Leverage ratio 10.32% — adequate headroom
+0
Loan Book Growth2/30
Loan book grew -3.7% YoY
+0
RWA grew 0.6% QoQ
+2
CRE: 14.968119185992185%, Lev.Loans: 0%, max(Consumer/SME): 22.30481346915402%
+0
Historical SRT15/25
Bank has previously issued SRT transactions
+15
5 months since last deal — recently completed
+0
Macro Context7/10
Live macro signal: FAVORABLE (sentiment +6/20) — 7/10 pts
+7
GSIB · Systemic Bank

Globally systemically important bank — one of the designated GSIBs. $500B–$1.25T total assets — active repeat issuers, genuine sourcing targets

+5
Macro environment · FAVORABLE+2

Sentiment +6/20 · global +2 pts

Overall SRT likelihood72/100